1. What
is the link to Crisis Management?
Shenzhen Proview Technology had
all iPad’s taken off the shelf in the Xinhua district as even though Apple
purchased the rights from Proview Taipei, the mainland company says its still
owns the name in China. This is a potential crisis for the company as iPad’s
are a large proportion of their sales.
2. What
stage of Crisis Management does the system appear to be at?
The system appears to be at the
cusp of an issue towards a risk. Given the earlier incident on the lack of
availability of iPhones and now having their iPad’s removed from shelves poses
potential risk that they will lose large shares of the Asian market. If such issues continue to pile up, this can
cause a potential crisis for Apple. Especially from a brand management
perspective, turning customers away from Apple products completely and shifting
loyal customers to purchasing other products as a result of lack of trust and
credibility in Apple is a potential concern.
3. How
well does the system appear to be handling the situation?
The system seems to be handling
the situation poorly. The authorities in
more than 20 cities have begun to destroy promotional materials that violate
its trademark. Further, calls to Beijing and Shanghai commercial bureaus have
not been answered so the company does not have further information. In
addition, when asked the spokesperson in Beijing has declined to comment. They
should have at minimum provided some statement to the public.
4. What
level of crisis preparedness does the system appear to have?
The system does not seem to be prepared and therefore receive a level 1. There is no crisis communication plan in place in China and they seem to lack control over all of the situation. Further, no information has been given to the public and it seems that Apple did not see this coming since they purchased the rights from Proview Taipei.
The system does not seem to be prepared and therefore receive a level 1. There is no crisis communication plan in place in China and they seem to lack control over all of the situation. Further, no information has been given to the public and it seems that Apple did not see this coming since they purchased the rights from Proview Taipei.
5. What
personal reactions/feelings does the description trigger in you?
It was interesting to learn that
the iPad name was registered in China first and that Apple did not have the
rights to this initially. Further, it is interesting to see the cross-bordering
issues at play. While the rights were purchased in Taiwan, they were not in
China came as a surprise to me. Overall, I was surprised to see all the issues that Apple is facing despite the fact
that general public reputation is that the company is doing well. No doubt,
even when you are at the top there will be issues that potentially can become crises
that companies need to plan
6. What
advice would you offer to those involved?
I would suggest Apple have
business continuity plan in place to learn from this situation and to be able
to ensure operations return back to normal as soon as possible. I would also
suggest a more cohesive integration between teams, as there was no response
from commercial bureaus, Apple should have a government relations department to
manage this relationship, especially in a country that has so much regulation.
(E.g. censorship of materials)
Article Source:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/tech-news/chinese-confiscate-apple-ipads-in-name-dispute/article2336231/
Article Source:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/tech-news/chinese-confiscate-apple-ipads-in-name-dispute/article2336231/
No comments:
Post a Comment