Wednesday, 14 March 2012

TTC shooting raises concern




1.    What is the link to Crisis Management?
A TTC fare collector was shot by a man that matches the suspect’s description this past June and in October at Dupont station. Union members have stated that no extra measures have been taken at after the previous robberies.

2.    What stage of Crisis Management does the system appear to be at?
The system is at a crisis stage for TTC workers as their well-being is at stake. For the TTC victim, William Anderson, this is a crisis. He was shot twice- once in the neck and once in the shoulder. For William’s wife this is a major crisis since she already feared for her husband’s safety following the first two armed attacks.

For Andy Byford interim leader of TTC, Bob Kinnear, union president and Mayor Rob Ford, this is a risk. There have been other robberies and action steps have been taken to improve safety, however clearly these steps are not effective and another solution is required.

For the public this is an issue progressing towards a risk. The time of the previous robberies was reported at 9:26 pm and the second at 7:20 pm – which is not that late and many travellers are riding the TTC at that time.

3.    How well does the system appear to be handling the situation?
The system is handling the situation poorly.  Andy (interim leader of TTC) did not apologize or empathize with the situation.  Rather he stated in the article that there was no obvious reason why Dupont station should be any more dangerous then any other location.  This is not comforting statement for any reader as it further raises concerns that this is not isolated to just Dupont station, rather all stations pose the same risk.  In addition the statement contrasts to Bob Kinnear (union president) that says this station is not the only safety concern for his members since other stations are more deserted and darker.  Finally, the Inspector on the case also finds it strange the suspect continues to go back to the same booth and subway station- that there must be a reason but does not offer anything else which further opens the reader to further interpret what possible reasons there are potentially coming up with something far worse.

4.    What level of crisis preparedness does the system appear to have?

The system has a level 2.5 for preparedness. While TTC has taken action steps such as limiting cash, installing emergency alarms and cameras and examining other ways to increase security across the system- these solutions have not resolved the issue, and further they have not caught the gentleman who continues to rob and harm TTC employees.

The communication plan post crisis is extremely poor from the interim leader at TTC who doesn’t offer any reassurance of safety to the public or to the family of William Anderson.

5.    What personal reactions/feelings does the description trigger in you?
Major Rob Ford suggested that he would be open to the option of replacing collectors with an automated fare system to keep workers safe. Union Leader Kinnear responds that if stations are not safe for staff, how can they be safe for the public? The article ends with this note and I was surprised the Mayor did not respond (or insist a response was written in this article) to that. This leaves me, a TTC rider a very unsettling thought that even the Mayor is not looking for long-term safety solutions for both riders and workers. Further, the times in which these robberies occurred was not late in the evening, in fact, I am on the subway at those times which is even more unsettling that such crimes are not isolated to late in the evening.


6.    What advice would you offer to those involved?
I would recommend future solutions would look at the various risks involved from multiple perspectives- safety of workers and travellers. I would recommend that TTC leader have a crisis communication plan to better address the public and concerns that this might raise for both the family and every day TTC travelers.

No iPad's in China!



1.    What is the link to Crisis Management?
Shenzhen Proview Technology had all iPad’s taken off the shelf in the Xinhua district as even though Apple purchased the rights from Proview Taipei, the mainland company says its still owns the name in China. This is a potential crisis for the company as iPad’s are a large proportion of their sales.

2.    What stage of Crisis Management does the system appear to be at?
The system appears to be at the cusp of an issue towards a risk. Given the earlier incident on the lack of availability of iPhones and now having their iPad’s removed from shelves poses potential risk that they will lose large shares of the Asian market.  If such issues continue to pile up, this can cause a potential crisis for Apple. Especially from a brand management perspective, turning customers away from Apple products completely and shifting loyal customers to purchasing other products as a result of lack of trust and credibility in Apple is a potential concern. 

3.    How well does the system appear to be handling the situation?
The system seems to be handling the situation poorly.  The authorities in more than 20 cities have begun to destroy promotional materials that violate its trademark. Further, calls to Beijing and Shanghai commercial bureaus have not been answered so the company does not have further information. In addition, when asked the spokesperson in Beijing has declined to comment. They should have at minimum provided some statement to the public.

4.    What level of crisis preparedness does the system appear to have?
    The system does not seem to be prepared and therefore receive a level 1. There is no crisis communication plan in place in China and they seem to lack control over all of the situation. Further, no information has been given to the public and it seems that Apple did not see this coming since they purchased the rights from Proview Taipei.

5.    What personal reactions/feelings does the description trigger in you?
It was interesting to learn that the iPad name was registered in China first and that Apple did not have the rights to this initially. Further, it is interesting to see the cross-bordering issues at play. While the rights were purchased in Taiwan, they were not in China came as a surprise to me.  Overall, I was surprised to see all the issues that Apple is facing despite the fact that general public reputation is that the company is doing well. No doubt, even when you are at the top there will be issues that potentially can become crises that companies need to plan

6.    What advice would you offer to those involved?
I would suggest Apple have business continuity plan in place to learn from this situation and to be able to ensure operations return back to normal as soon as possible. I would also suggest a more cohesive integration between teams, as there was no response from commercial bureaus, Apple should have a government relations department to manage this relationship, especially in a country that has so much regulation. (E.g. censorship of materials)


Article Source: 
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/tech-news/chinese-confiscate-apple-ipads-in-name-dispute/article2336231/

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Censorship in today's society?



1.    What is the link to Crisis Management?
A law was passed last year stating that companies would be responsible for user content posted on their website. As a result, large Internet companies such as Google Inc. and Facebook will need to remove content that is from some Indian domain websites. Further, there is risk about censorship in the world’s democracy while there is also a risk of violence between religious groups if material is not censored which presents a danger to the public.  

2.    What stage of Crisis Management does the system appear to be at?
The system appears to be at the risk stage.  This is because India has created new rules to block offensive content for over a year now, but India’s Internet access is still largely uncensored. Further, censorship of material is very controversial especially in a world of democracy.

3.    How well does the system appear to be handling the situation?
The system is handling the situation poorly. This is because most companies appear to not have a risk management plan to deal with this and all companies failed to clarify what they were doing.
·       Google said it was not possible for them to block content
·       Facebook said they would release a statement later
·       Microsoft said “no further comments can be given”

4.    What level of crisis preparedness does the system appear to have?
     
       The system does is given a 1 for preparedness. Given the immense amount of information that can be posted over the internet, companies such as Google Inc. will need to create a plan in place to ensure content is screened continuously as they will continued to be court ordered if this is not done. Currently there is nothing in place which is why they are being taken to court. 

5.    What personal reactions/feelings does the description trigger in you?
I am surprised and have definitely taken fore granted the democratic society in North America. Censorship is such a difficult situation since it can cause chaos and uproar in the public similar to the situation in Tiananmen Square. However, I realize there is also a history of violence here between religious groups that needs to be addressed and having censorship will lessen the probability of violence between groups. 

6.    What advice would you offer to those involved?
I would tell the companies that they all need to provide more information to the public and government as to what has been done and what they can expect to see continually removed/what mechanism will be used. I would recommend that “no comment” not be used as a response as it takes away the credibility of the company and can be seen by the public that the company is hiding something. I would request the government to provide some support as to how and what time lines they expect, and what they can do on their end to assist the companies at achieving the goal of censoring the proper content within a feasible time frame.


Article Source:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/tech-news/facebook-google-bow-to-indian-censorship-demands/article2327810/

Monday, 12 March 2012

Apple strategy potentially causing trouble for China consumers


1.    What is the link to Crisis Management?
The Beijing marketinterest for iPhone’s has caused a riot among black marketeers as thousands of people waited outside the store overnight to hear the news that the U.S group suspended their sales of iPhone’s in China creating chaos outside the store.

2.    What stage of Crisis Management does the system appear to be at?
The system appears to be in the issue stage. This article states that although iPhone sales have been suspended, things were business as usual and therefore the chaos that was created earlier, had subsided. That being said, this still is an issue for Apple as they are losing sales and market share within China. Further, this could create more uproar from consumers in China if U.S group continues to fail to provide more information as to how long they will have to wait for device availability in China.

3.    How well does the system appear to be handling the situation?
The system appears to be handing the situation moderately. On the one hand it seems that Apple has been keeping supply scarce in China has part of a strategy to increase consumer desire. On the one hand it seems that this has gone to an extreme where chaos and riots are occurring as a result of it. There must be a fine balance that U.S group could identify to ensure that there strategy of increasing appeal can be maintained without having consumers causing trouble. The article further states that the Apple does admit to having significant order backlog due to high demand. As a result, they will need to address as soon as possible.

4.    What level of crisis preparedness does the system appear to have?
       The system has a 3 level of preparedness. This is because they knew of low supply availability and     could suspect that a protential riot could occur for their product. However, they are uncertain at the moment as to when their product will be available and therefore are not communicating all knowledge to consumers. 





5.    What personal reactions/feelings does the description trigger in you?
I thought it was very interesting that Apple’s strategy included a scarce supply to increase appeal, as this is very typical in Asian culture. Often items that are “special editions” with certain numbers available have driven consumers to obtain this item at any cost. Not only have I seen it happen throughout Asia, I probably have been a victim of this myself while in Asia. That being said, I was surprised that the company would allow it to get to a point where consumers were so upset, it triggered a riot. Furthermore, I am surprised they were not able to provide more details to consumers as to when it would be available.  This is an opportunity for Apple to capitalise market share in China versus letting Samsung and Huawei take over.

6.    What advice would you offer to those involved?
I would advise Apple to communicate to consumers when they can expect product availability and to ensure they have enough supply to meet demand. The company cannot afford to have another riot incident because of lack of availability. If this continues to occur, this could turn consumers off from the product completely. Furthermore, if this is part of their strategy, it opens up the potential that another riot occurs causing further injuries to people which can turn into a serious problem for Apple. 


Article Source:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-news/global-exchange/financial-times/apple-fans-the-flames-in-china/article2314400/